Friday, November 20, 2009

Environmentalists Exposed As Liars

According to Watts Up With That website, the CRU has been hacked and what appears to be genuine documents and emails exposing the shabby treatment of science by these so-called climatologists is appalling. Emails expressing joy that a scientist who disagreed with their research has died. Documents describing how they are covering up the scientific facts they don't like because it proves them wrong.

For Shame. And typical of the movement which has a ghastly history.

At any rate, here are the links. Decide for yourself. The Climate Depot is an excellent starting point - here.

Breaking News Story: CRU has apparently been hacked – hundreds of files released

You can download the entire zip file at but it is 61mb of text. That's a lot of emails to go through.

HadleyCRU says leaked data is real

Sen. Inhofe Roundup of Key Moments Challenging Science of Man-Made Global Warming AND Inhofe declares victory in speech on global warming

Inhofe to Boxer: “We won, you lost — get a life!” Since there is no doubt in my mind that Barbara Boxer is a scum-sucking politician of dubious ethics, incapable of honesty and lacking a basic understanding of morality, I applaud Sen. Inhofe's statements below:

Hacked: Hadley CRU FOI2009 Files

UPDATED: Hadley CRU emails disclosed

Seems to me that someone has hacked UAH computers. All e-mails seem to contain at least an addrees ending Also all the files seem to be UAH-related. At least some of the material has to be real, there are just so many small details that were just impossible to fake (for instance under briffa-treering-external/timonen there are some file names only a Finn would use).
[62 Meg file below]

CRU Correspondence

From the hacked Hadley CRU files: IPCC lead author’s private admission: ‘The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.’

The Blue-Dress Moment May Have Arrived

Leaked FOIA files 62 mb of gold

Hadley CRU hacked with release of hundreds of docs and emails

Global warming's hidden files

Real files or fake?

Must-see video: Coal CEO routs green reporter

This preface was sent by the hacker/mole on 17 November to various sites [from CA]: We feel that climate science is, in the current situation, too important to be kept under wraps.
We hereby release a random selection of correspondence, code, and documents.
Hopefully it will give some insight into the science and the people behind it.
This is a limited time offer, download now:
0926010576.txt * Mann: working towards a common goal
1189722851.txt * Jones: “try and change the Received date!”
0924532891.txt * Mann vs. CRU
0847838200.txt * Briffa & Yamal 1996: “too much growth in recent years makes it difficult to derive a valid age/growth curve”
0926026654.txt * Jones: MBH dodgy ground
1225026120.txt * CRU’s truncated temperature curve
1059664704.txt * Mann: dirty laundry
1062189235.txt * Osborn: concerns with MBH uncertainty
0926947295.txt * IPCC scenarios not supposed to be realistic
0938018124.txt * Mann: “something else” causing discrepancies
0939154709.txt * Osborn: we usually stop the series in 1960
0933255789.txt * WWF report: beef up if possible
0998926751.txt * “Carefully constructed” model scenarios to get “distinguishable results”
0968705882.txt * CLA: “IPCC is not any more an assessment of published science but production of results”
1075403821.txt * Jones: Daly death “cheering news”
1029966978.txt * Briffa – last decades exceptional, or not?
1092167224.txt * Mann: “not necessarily wrong, but it makes a small difference” (factor 1.29)
1188557698.txt * Wigley: “Keenan has a valid point”
1118949061.txt * we’d like to do some experiments with different proxy combinations
1120593115.txt * I am reviewing a couple of papers on extremes, so that I can refer to them in the chapter for AR4

Sounds to me like someone on the inside, rather than a hack. Time will tell.

The emails include damning admissions of eg how Mann played "tricks" to diminish recent-year cooling.

'Welcome to the delayers': Obama's 'half-hearted climate efforts' welcomed by skeptics


  1. TGTBT?




  2. "From: Phil Jones
    To: "Michael E. Mann"
    Date: Thu Jul 8 16:30:16 2004


    I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!


    Here are a "few" of the papers they managed to keep out,

    450 Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skepticism of "Man-Made" Global Warming