Friday, May 27, 2011
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Daily Round-Up 05-24
President Obama’s top ten insults against Britain – 2011 edition
Dem in NY-26 Race Doesn't Live in District, Can't Vote
THE GOOD NEWS IS...
University Poll: Fox News Most Trusted News Source
The tea party is here to stay in Utah's political races
In Senate, Eye-For-An-Eye Filibuster Stops Democratic Nominee
58% of Americans Believe the Country Would Be No Different or Better Off If Congress Met Every Two Years
Tea Party movement likely to have unglamorous but effective future
GENERAL BAD BEHAVIOR
The myth of Sarah Palin’s stupidity
Open Records Requests Uncovers Abuse Of Same-Day Registration In Wisconsin
Automotive Black Boxes, Minus the Gray Area
Lawmakers Concerned About Ex-IMF Director's 'Golden Parachute'
Immigration and ‘Secure Communities’
Supreme Court's Scary Power Grab
Christie’s Education Reforms Run Afoul of Supreme Court (the ruling, not Christie)
It was a stupid mistake. Let's hope he corrects it. Cain pushes back on Muslim comments again
New York Power Company Charges Town Honoring War Hero Flag Fee
AP sources: DNA matches Strauss-Kahn in sex attack BUT New York police deny Strauss-Kahn DNA report
Tax cheats among recipients of stimulus money
Herman Cain Says GOP Gives Him No Respect
On path to riches, no sign of fluffy majors
AND THE GOOD GUYS ARE...
Herman Cain: This is "Our" Campaign
Pawlenty calls for phasing out ethanol subsidies -- in Iowa AND In Florida, Pawlenty calls for entitlement reform
Georgia Moms Revolt Against New City Law That Limits Breastfeeding in Public
All 47 Senate Republicans Rip Democrats' Budget Cowardice
Why Scott Walker Drives Liberals Crazy
PLANNED PARENTHOOD/ABORTION SCANDAL
Of Course: Obama Administration Will Oppose Indiana's Anti-Planned Parenthood Move
Christine Stansell’s Slanted History
Study shows girls increasingly aborted in India
Gallup: 61 Percent Say All or Most Abortions Should Be Illegal
Why Are Some Pro-Choicers Ruing Roe?
Bad Politician Bad 05-24
President Obama Job Approval
Latest Election Polls
2012 Republican Presidential Nomination
Zogby 2012 Presidential Election: 52 Percent Say 'Time for Someone New'
Cain Takes Lead Over Romney
Newt Crashes to Near Zero
58% of Americans Believe the Country Would Be No Different or Better Off If Congress Met Every Two Years
Obama White House Bans Newspaper For Printing a Mitt Romney Op Ed
New Position At The White House: Unfavorable Online Media Czar
WH Hires "Negative Story" Squasher
Richard Milhous Obama?
An Anti-Israel President The president's peace proposal is a formula for war.
Obama's land swap surprise. Perhaps the most stunning element of Netanyahu’s Washington trip is the degree to which he was surprised by Obama.
Powerful Netanyahu Speech Rebukes Obama in Front of Congress AND Bibi Schools Obama On Mideast Reality AND Bibi 4, Obama 1
President Obama’s top ten insults against Britain – 2011 edition
Oh for Pity's Sake! - President Obama Has No Idea What Year It Is And here
Feeding North Korea's madness
Conservative group hits Labor Dept. with FOIA request for cost of iPhone app development
“Don’t look now, Latinos. But you’ve been stung.”
Thomas Sowell - Dependency and Votes. “Entitlement” is just another word for “dependency.”
President Obama’s Excellent Idea
A Superfluous Federal Agency Is Caught Discriminating — Again! This latest scandal involving ugly discrimination against a dedicated member of the military is just another outrageous example of why Congress should shut down the U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
Hey, sometimes we love federalism
Lies and the decline of the League of Women Voters
Political Candidates Ignore Social Media at their Peril
Thomas Sowell - Dependency and Votes. “Entitlement” is just another word for “dependency.”
Federal Spending Expands Governance by Bureaucracy
Snowe’s a ‘No’ on the Ryan Budget
League of Women Voters = DNC in hairnets*
All Eyes on NY-26 Republicans are bracing themselves to lose a House seat carried by John McCain.
What Obama's Political Team Thinks of the Republican Field
The Self-Destructing Republican Party?
Don't Let Liberal Establishment Choose Our Candidates
Documents Raise Questions about Kagan’s Role in Obamacare Defense
Facebook upgrade spurs fears of political bias
In Economic Woes 05-24
Never Did Get A Job From A Poor Man
FCC Makes-Up Jobs Claims
Bank Failures Rise for 2011
Reining In Regulation by Delegation: A Guide to the REINS Act
Key small business group missing from big lobbying battle of the year
The Absurd Keynesian Fiscal Factoid
It's All Your Money: Foreign Aid to Muslim/Arab nations
Small businesses about to get HIT
Obama Admits Businesses Creates Jobs, Not Govt
Thomas Sowell - Dependency and Votes. “Entitlement” is just another word for “dependency.”
Voters vs. the Welfare State
From Social Security to Food Benefits, It’s Welfare Gone Wild. New revelations suggest just how badly the broken system busts budgets.
Federal Spending Expands Governance by Bureaucracy
This is What Stagflation Looks Like
US Worse Off Financially Than Euro Nations
General Motors Will Never Repay Taxpayers. Obama's spin on GM's latest profit report is pure baloney
Why New York's future is fleeing. Nowhere near enough jobs for the younger generation
A Pension Crisis Hits Illinois
Illinois Treasurer: We're broke. Stop lending us money
Where Dreams Die
House to Vote on ‘Clean’ Debt Increase
Community Banks Lobby to Limit New Regulations
Low-Tax Jurisdictions Should Resist OECD Attacks Against Tax Competition and Fiscal Sovereignty
In Europe, Rifts Widen Over Greece
Obamacare 05-24
Documents Raise Questions about Kagan’s Role in Obamacare Defense
Small businesses about to get HIT
What to Take Away from the Trustees Reports
Cookbook Medicine
5 Reasons We Need To Reform Medicare Right Now
One Option for Medicare Reform
Tort reform bill takes fire from right
Federalism and Tort Reform
Tea Party Doctor Issues Obamacare Debate Challenge
Junk Science 05-24
USDA Closes Rabbit Show Loophole
NASA Scientist Helps Teens Sue Government over Climate Change
BWAHAHAHA - SUVs saved Chrysler
Something Rotten (and I Don’t Mean the Marmite)
New Issa report goes after Obama administration’s energy agenda
Al Gore addresses Hamilton grads (grads yawn)
Truth to power: Tim Pawlenty goes to Iowa, demands an end to farm subsidies
The world hasn’t ended and it’s not going to, because global warming is [EXPLETIVE DELETED]
NBC’s Al Roker: Climate change bringing tornadoes to urban areas
White House: No more full-size vehicles unless essential. This from the man who got stuck in "The Beast"?
They don’t want you to travel
Media Bias 05-24
Obama White House Bans Newspaper For Printing a Mitt Romney Op Ed
The Credibility Canard. For the MSM, political experience only counts when Democratic presidents are in trouble.
Senate debates president’s power during cyber-attack. Existing law crafted in 1934 for radio
Ex-Manhattan Madam: ABC News has ‘no balls’
Key Internet summit to discuss online rules
Facebook upgrade spurs fears of political bias
Fact-checking the fact-checker
Mainstream Media’s French Kiss to Alleged IMF Pervert Dominique Strauss-Kahn
Internet rules at center of 'e-G8' forum in Paris
The myth of Sarah Palin’s stupidity
Fox News Executives Dispute Quote About Palin
What Is ‘The Tragedy of Sarah Palin’? To the Atlantic, it's that she didn't choose to be a liberal.
New Position At The White House: Unfavorable Online Media Czar
WH Hires "Negative Story" Squasher
Big Sis? Feds Seize 8 More Domains in Piracy Crackdown
See No Evil: Challenging the Narrative on Homegrown Islamic Terrorism. A review of Erick Stakelbeck’s The Terrorist Next Door: How the Government is Deceiving You about the Islamist Threat.
NBC’s Al Roker: Climate change bringing tornadoes to urban areas
A Tell-All With Nothing to Tell
Washington Post Whitewashes Obama’s Illegal War
Beck’s Out of Control Lies About His Role In The Shirley Sherrod Media Trainwreck
Media Circus of Biblical Proportions at Armageddon HQ
Big Union/Leftie Groups 05-24
AFL-CIO leader gives blessing to disclosure order on donations
The NLRB’s Opening Of Pandora’s Box Beyond Boeing
The Wages of Envy
Pension Proposal Draws Ire of Federal Unions
Union Member Strikes Back at the Obama-Big Labor Regulatory Attack on Employees
MoveOn presses Dems to take hard line against Medicare cuts
Labor Studies Professor: Andrew Breitbart’s ‘Electronic Brownshirts’
Fighting Corruption/TEA Party News 05-24
Reading Tea (Party) Leaves
Tea Party Doctor Issues Obamacare Debate Challenge
The tea party is here to stay in Utah's political races
Union Member Strikes Back at the Obama-Big Labor Regulatory Attack on Employees
Tea Party movement likely to have unglamorous but effective future
Open Records Requests Uncovers Abuse Of Same-Day Registration In Wisconsin
Monday, May 23, 2011
Random Round-Up 05-23
President Obama Job Approval
Latest Election Polls
2012 Republican Presidential Nomination
The Case for Voter ID You can't cash a check, board a plane, or even buy full-strength Sudafed over the counter without ID. Why should voting be different?
Dear Congress, Your Credit Application Has Been Turned Down. Why should the American people keep extending credit to Capitol Hill?
Wisconsin Recount Over, Results Unchanged
NLRB Admits Boeing Complaint Applies To Every Business & State
For Democrats, It's All About Tax Hikes
Job creation limps along after recession
Debt-limit crisis could force us to do the right thing
Madison on the Pacific
Americans Still Split Along "Pro-Choice," "Pro-Life" Lines. Majorities believe abortion is morally wrong, legal access to it should be restricted
You Stay Classy, CNN
Would You Prefer Privatization or a Death Panel?
Obamacare waiver corruption must stop. If some Americans deserve exemption from a bad law, then all Americans do
More useless gov't. New fed agency won't solve anything
Trumka issues threat to Dems: Help us or pay
How Do Unions Affect State Budgets?
Swift Teens Speak Now
Rotten Argument: SEIU Now Attacking Sodexo on Food Quality, Workers Rights Nowhere to be Seen
Obama digging up dirt on potential opponent Chris Christie
Spain's Socialists Trounced Amid Economic Turmoil
Civil Unions And "White's Only"
Recently I've been asked a lot and repeatedly about my views on "gay marriage" and my relatively liberal questioners have given the same dismissive response to my position - "but that's 'separate but equal'." I'd like to take this opportunity to lay out my position on "gay marriage" and explain why the liberal talking point of "separate but equal" is profoundly insulting and outright wrong.
Before I begin, I want to make it clear that my position is not based on religion in any way. Also, it needs to be said that America's freedom of religion means that no American government can force any religious institution to perform a marriage ceremony for people that institution deems outside their beliefs. Period. American Catholics, Hindus, Muslims, Jews, Shintos, Buddhists, and many Protestant sects will never marry anyone except a man and a woman.
Additionally, love is love. What I outline below in no way means I believe that any two people who are committed to one another have to be male and female for it to be "real". That is a disgusting position. Love is real.
My position begins with the very basic fact that for vast numbers of organisms living on planet earth, life and evolution exists because a male and female breed offspring. That reproduction, the most basic element of life itself, is the root from which marriage evolved as a social construct amongst human cultures.
That throughout human history and across human cultures, the vast percentage of humans view marriage as between a man and a woman. Basically because of the biological facts above.
The huge majority of humans are heterosexual. America is democracy. Advocates of "gay marriage" within the gay population itself represent a relatively small population of that community as well. The concept of "gay marriage" has been gaining acceptance for years but changing the definition of marriage itself has not. Which is why most Americans have rejected "gay marriage" laws.
Civil Unions are a legitimate offer to provide homosexuals wishing to enter into a committed union the same legal protections as heterosexual couples have when married while preserving the ancient meaning of marriage.
In my opinion, Civil Unions offer a heartfelt solution to this situation. While as I've indicated above, I believe marriage is between a man and a woman, I wholeheartedly believe that love is transcendental and that anyone who wishes to commit their love to another person deserves the same legal status. However, the long, deep, and consistent history of marriage being between a man and a woman means that I can only support Civil Unions as an honest remedy to helping homosexual couples receive the same legal protections as heterosexual ones.
Yet, Civil Unions are dismissed as "Separate But Equal". And this is where I get really mad.
Given the context of "separate but equal" using it as the knee-jerk reaction to honest debate and attempts at a real solution is bullying and an attempt to shut down the discussion. The racist origins of "separate but equal" were exclusionary. "White's Only". The offer of Civil Unions is inclusive.
The context of "separate but equal" means to claim Civil Unions are "separate but equal" is tantamount to saying those who support Civil Unions are the equivalent of racists.
Worse, suggesting that homosexuals who can not marry are suffering the same as African Americans did during segregation is degrading to all those who had to sit at the back of the bus, who couldn't vote or eat in most restaurants. It is degrading to all the Freedom Riders who fought and died to end segregation. What does it say about the liberal view of Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King's legacy when they compare situations?
Just how many gay couples wake up to burning crosses on their front lawn?
Yes racism exists. Yes homophobia exists. Yes both are on the decline. Civil Unions are NOT 'separate but equal' but a serious offer to address a legitimate concern. An offer of Civil Union status in no way compares to a "Whites Only" sign.
And suggesting that it does is nothing but an attempt to shut down the debate and ignore an honest perspective and remedy.
So that's it. My position on "gay marriage". Love is real and transcendental. Marriage is the ancient social contract between a man and a woman. I believe that the new social contract of Civil Unions addresses the legal needs of homosexuals wishing to enter a legally committed relationship.
And finally, I believe that comparing Civil Unions to Segregation and the historic and brutal treatment of African-Americans as an attempt to shut down debate by ad homenin attacks via the racism card. That is wrong, unfair, and illiberal.
Before I begin, I want to make it clear that my position is not based on religion in any way. Also, it needs to be said that America's freedom of religion means that no American government can force any religious institution to perform a marriage ceremony for people that institution deems outside their beliefs. Period. American Catholics, Hindus, Muslims, Jews, Shintos, Buddhists, and many Protestant sects will never marry anyone except a man and a woman.
Additionally, love is love. What I outline below in no way means I believe that any two people who are committed to one another have to be male and female for it to be "real". That is a disgusting position. Love is real.
My position begins with the very basic fact that for vast numbers of organisms living on planet earth, life and evolution exists because a male and female breed offspring. That reproduction, the most basic element of life itself, is the root from which marriage evolved as a social construct amongst human cultures.
That throughout human history and across human cultures, the vast percentage of humans view marriage as between a man and a woman. Basically because of the biological facts above.
The huge majority of humans are heterosexual. America is democracy. Advocates of "gay marriage" within the gay population itself represent a relatively small population of that community as well. The concept of "gay marriage" has been gaining acceptance for years but changing the definition of marriage itself has not. Which is why most Americans have rejected "gay marriage" laws.
Civil Unions are a legitimate offer to provide homosexuals wishing to enter into a committed union the same legal protections as heterosexual couples have when married while preserving the ancient meaning of marriage.
In my opinion, Civil Unions offer a heartfelt solution to this situation. While as I've indicated above, I believe marriage is between a man and a woman, I wholeheartedly believe that love is transcendental and that anyone who wishes to commit their love to another person deserves the same legal status. However, the long, deep, and consistent history of marriage being between a man and a woman means that I can only support Civil Unions as an honest remedy to helping homosexual couples receive the same legal protections as heterosexual ones.
Yet, Civil Unions are dismissed as "Separate But Equal". And this is where I get really mad.
Given the context of "separate but equal" using it as the knee-jerk reaction to honest debate and attempts at a real solution is bullying and an attempt to shut down the discussion. The racist origins of "separate but equal" were exclusionary. "White's Only". The offer of Civil Unions is inclusive.
The context of "separate but equal" means to claim Civil Unions are "separate but equal" is tantamount to saying those who support Civil Unions are the equivalent of racists.
Worse, suggesting that homosexuals who can not marry are suffering the same as African Americans did during segregation is degrading to all those who had to sit at the back of the bus, who couldn't vote or eat in most restaurants. It is degrading to all the Freedom Riders who fought and died to end segregation. What does it say about the liberal view of Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King's legacy when they compare situations?
Just how many gay couples wake up to burning crosses on their front lawn?
Yes racism exists. Yes homophobia exists. Yes both are on the decline. Civil Unions are NOT 'separate but equal' but a serious offer to address a legitimate concern. An offer of Civil Union status in no way compares to a "Whites Only" sign.
And suggesting that it does is nothing but an attempt to shut down the debate and ignore an honest perspective and remedy.
So that's it. My position on "gay marriage". Love is real and transcendental. Marriage is the ancient social contract between a man and a woman. I believe that the new social contract of Civil Unions addresses the legal needs of homosexuals wishing to enter a legally committed relationship.
And finally, I believe that comparing Civil Unions to Segregation and the historic and brutal treatment of African-Americans as an attempt to shut down debate by ad homenin attacks via the racism card. That is wrong, unfair, and illiberal.
Labels:
civil unions,
gay,
gay marriage,
homosexual,
liberals,
love,
marriage,
racism,
segregation,
separate but equal
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)