Richard North provides some very strong arguments that the inclusion of "dodgy" research in the Working Group II report of the IPCC on the impacts of global warming was deliberate and that the attempts to distract from this amount to little more than 'shroud waving.' To my mind this is a far more important indictment of the IPCC than the initial Climategate revelations.
Friday, February 12, 2010
IPCCgate — Deliberate Alarmism?
(Originally posted by my husband on NRO - The Corner)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment