A Rose That Stinks

A rose by any other name would still smell bad.

According to the New York Times, global warming alarmists are losing the battle and rather examine why (because the science proves them wrong), the alarmists want to change the language to make their power-grabbing cramdown more palatable.

Instead of grim warnings about global warming, the firm advises, talk about “our deteriorating atmosphere.” Drop discussions of carbon dioxide and bring up “moving away from the dirty fuels of the past.” Don’t confuse people with cap and trade; use terms like “cap and cash back” or “pollution reduction refund.”

Charming.

Truth and scientific integrity are unknown to these jokers yet somehow liberals continue to believe they are the openminded ones. BAH!